The Education Exchange: Are Proficiency Standards Set too High?
/* custom css */
.tdi_2_fd0{
min-height: 0;
}
/* custom css */
.tdi_4_576{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
[soundcloud url=”https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/1270760359?secret_token=s-12003P2gAeF” params=”color=#ff5500&auto_play=true&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&show_teaser=true” width=”100%” height=”166″ iframe=”true” /]
/* custom css */
.tdi_6_468{
min-height: 0;
}
/* custom css */
.tdi_8_26d{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
A Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute and a Senior Fellow at Stanford’s Hoover Institution, Chester E. Finn, Jr., joins Paul E. Peterson to discuss Finn’s new book, Assessing the Nation’s Report Card: Challenges and Choices for NAEP.
Finn’s latest piece for Education Next, “It Felt Like Guerrilla Warfare” — Student achievement levels in the Nation’s Report Card: a brief history of “basic,” “proficient,” and “advanced,” is available now.
/* custom css */
.tdi_10_104{
min-height: 0;
}
/* custom css */
.tdi_12_d05{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Follow The Education Exchange on Soundcloud, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Stitcher or here on Education Next.
— Education Next
The post The Education Exchange: Are Proficiency Standards Set too High? appeared first on Education Next.
Source: EducationNext
Please Follow Us:
Please Share:
